Coello and Tapia dominate Paris Major as rivals struggle to keep up

The Paris Major brought a fresh wave of excitement and tactical intrigue to the padel season, challenging players with its unique conditions and setting the stage for dramatic upsets and standout performances. As established pairs struggled and new partnerships emerged, one duo managed to rise above the rest with remarkable consistency and teamwork. Dive in to discover how these shifting dynamics are shaping the race for the top spot on the tour.

Video created by: @the4Set

Paris major delivers historic drama and tactical challenges

The Premier Padel Paris Major 2024 stood out as one of the most memorable tournaments of the season, not just for its high-stakes matches but also for the unique playing conditions. According to the channel, Paris featured the slowest court so far this year, with points averaging 9.5 shots—a significant increase compared to the 6.7-shot average at the previous tournament in Valladolid. This slower pace, attributed to the court and atmospheric conditions, forced players to adapt their strategies, emphasizing patience, endurance, and tactical shot selection over outright power.

Many players, including the eventual finalists, commented on the physical and mental demands of these extended rallies. The reviewer noted that while some players thrive in these conditions, others struggle to maintain focus and consistency. The slow court in Paris became a true test of resilience and adaptability, reshaping the dynamics of every match.

Debuts and upsets: new pairings face tough Parisian tests

Paris also marked the debut of several new pairings, with mixed results. Alex Ruiz and Arroyo faced a difficult start, losing their opening match to Yanguas and Domínguez. Similarly, Bela and Tino struggled, falling to Campagnolo and Mourino. For these teams, the path to the season-ending Master Final now looks nearly impossible, as highlighted by the channel’s analysis.

In contrast, Garrido, another debutant in Paris, enjoyed a far more successful run, reaching the finals before losing to the dominant pairing of Chingotto and Galán. The reviewer suggested that Garrido and his partner showed promising chemistry, potentially rivaling established duos like Momo González and Álex Alonso, who themselves reached another quarterfinal in Paris after a hard-fought match against Lebrón and Di Nenno.

Semifinal showdown: galán and chingotto outclass lebrón and di nenno

One of the tournament’s most anticipated matches saw Galán and Chingotto face off against Lebrón and Di Nenno in the semifinals. Despite not feeling at their best, Galán and Chingotto delivered a commanding performance, highlighted by Galán’s remarkable offensive output. The channel pointed out that Galán alone recorded more winners than Lebrón and Di Nenno combined, a testament to his aggressive play and ability to seize control of rallies.

However, the reviewer also noted a tactical imbalance: while Martín Di Nenno played a secure, low-error game, this approach limited his ability to finish points, putting extra pressure on Lebrón. In contrast, Chingotto took more risks, resulting in both more winners and more errors, but ultimately allowing his partner to close out points more effectively. The analysis suggested that for Lebrón and Di Nenno to reach the very top, Di Nenno may need to adopt a more aggressive mindset, even if it increases his error count.

Final analysis: coello and tapia’s dominance and the impossible point

The final between Arturo Coello and Agustín Tapia and the “Chingalán” duo (Galán and Chingotto) was defined by a single, extraordinary moment. As described by the channel, Coello managed to save an “impossible” ball from the ground, turning the tide and securing a crucial break. From that point onward, Coello and Tapia asserted total dominance, never allowing their opponents a single break point.

Statistically, the match was one-sided. Both Galán and Chingotto finished with more errors than winners, while Coello emerged as the clear MVP with 11 winners and only 3 unforced errors. This is particularly impressive given the slow Parisian court, where smashes are difficult to finish—Coello managed just five smash winners, yet controlled the net and defensive exchanges with remarkable consistency.

The reviewer credited much of Coello’s transformation to his coach, Gustavo Pratto, noting that Coello now presents a defensive “wall” that even elite opponents struggle to break down. The synergy between Coello and Tapia has reached new heights, making them the benchmark for the rest of the tour.

Race for number one: coello and tapia extend their lead

With their Paris victory, Coello and Tapia have now won five consecutive titles, boasting an incredible 25–1 win-loss record since their lowest point earlier in the season at the Genoa final. The channel highlighted that the gap in the rankings between Coello/Tapia and Galán/Chingotto has now widened to 2,900 points, making it extremely difficult for any challengers to catch them before the end of the year.

After the final, Coello dedicated heartfelt words to Tapia, emphasizing their mutual respect, admiration, and the joy they find in competing together. This emotional bond, combined with their technical prowess, seems to be the foundation of their ongoing success.

Player ratings from the Paris major final

  • Arturo Coello: 11 winners, 3 unforced errors (clear MVP)
  • Agustín Tapia: Key defensive and tactical contributions, strong net play
  • Ale Galán: More errors than winners, struggled to break through Coello/Tapia’s defense
  • Fede Chingotto: More errors than winners, unable to impose usual rhythm

These ratings, as discussed by the channel, reflect the clear superiority of Coello and Tapia in the Paris final, both statistically and in overall impact on the match.

Looking ahead: what the Paris major means for the season

The Paris Major has set a new standard for intensity and tactical depth on the Premier Padel circuit. With Coello and Tapia in dominant form and the rest of the field scrambling to close the gap, the race for the number one ranking looks increasingly one-sided. However, as the reviewer noted, the evolving partnerships and the unpredictable nature of padel mean that every tournament still holds the potential for surprises.

The tour now heads toward the World Cup, where fans and players alike will be eager to see if anyone can challenge the reign of Coello and Tapia—or if their historic run will continue unbroken.

Article written by

Practica Padel Team

Practica Padel Team

Specialists in curating insights from padel coaches, professional players, and trusted reviewers. Our goal is to make expert knowledge easy to understand and accessible for every player.

READ MORE

Frequently asked questions

What made the Paris Major court unique compared to other tournaments this season?

The Paris Major featured the slowest court of the year, resulting in longer rallies averaging 9.5 shots per point. This slower pace forced players to rely more on patience, endurance, and tactical play rather than pure power, making matches more physically and mentally demanding.

How did Coello and Tapia manage to dominate their opponents in the Paris Major final?

Coello and Tapia dominated by combining strong defensive skills, excellent net control, and remarkable consistency. Coello, in particular, stood out with 11 winners and just 3 unforced errors, while their synergy and tactical discipline prevented their opponents from earning a single break point.

Which new pairings debuted at the Paris Major, and how did they perform?

Several new pairings debuted, including Alex Ruiz and Arroyo, and Bela and Tino, both of whom struggled and lost their opening matches. In contrast, Garrido and his new partner had a successful run, reaching the finals and showing promising chemistry for future tournaments.

What are the key strengths of Coello and Tapia as a team?

Coello and Tapia’s key strengths include their defensive solidity, tactical intelligence, and strong partnership chemistry. Coello’s transformation into a defensive wall, guided by coach Gustavo Pratto, and Tapia’s net play and tactical contributions make them the benchmark team on the tour.

How did the slow court conditions affect player strategies during the Paris Major?

The slow court conditions forced players to adapt by focusing on longer rallies, patience, and careful shot selection. Players who relied on quick points and power struggled, while those with endurance and tactical discipline, like Coello and Tapia, thrived under these demanding conditions.

What does the Paris Major result mean for the race to the number one ranking?

Coello and Tapia’s victory in Paris extended their lead in the rankings to 2,900 points over their nearest rivals. With five consecutive titles and a 25–1 win-loss record, they have made it extremely difficult for any challengers to catch them before the end of the year.

What advice did the reviewer offer for players aiming to compete at the top level?

The reviewer emphasized the importance of adaptability, resilience, and a willingness to take calculated risks. For example, players like Di Nenno may need to adopt a more aggressive approach, even if it increases errors, to effectively challenge the top teams in high-stakes matches.