Key technical differences between Oxdog Hyper Pro 2.0 and Hyper Pro+ 2.0
The reviewer highlights three main differences between the Oxdog Hyper Pro 2.0 and the Oxdog Hyper Pro+ 2.0: weight, balance, and core hardness. While both rackets share the same mold and overall design, these distinctions create a noticeable impact on court performance.
- Weight: Hyper Pro averages 365g (±10g), Hyper Pro+ averages 370g. The tested rackets, with two overgrips and a cap plate, weighed 369g (Hyper Pro) and 374g (Hyper Pro+). Removing the cap plate drops the Hyper Pro+ to 368g and Hyper Pro to 361g.
- Balance: Hyper Pro has a 25.7 cm balance point with the plate, 26.4 cm without. Hyper Pro+ sits at 26 cm with the plate, 26.6 cm without.
- Core: Hyper Pro uses Oxdog’s medium plus rubber, offering a slightly above-medium hardness. Hyper Pro+ features the hard rubber, resulting in a firmer, drier feel and a smaller sweet spot.
Both rackets feature the same GES carbon (comparable to 3K carbon but with a unique weave), a rough sandy finish, and Oxdog’s Power Ribs for vibration dampening. The grip is slightly longer than standard at around 13 cm, and both have air channels and an inverted Y reinforcement in the heart for stability.
Defensive play: comfort, sweet spot, and manageability
In defensive situations, the reviewer notes that the Hyper Pro 2.0 stands out for its superior handling and comfort. The lower weight and balance make it easier to maneuver, and the larger sweet spot offers more forgiveness on off-center hits. The ball output and rebound are also slightly better, allowing for easier returns at a fast pace.
By contrast, the Hyper Pro+ 2.0 feels less comfortable in defense, particularly due to its higher weight and balance. The smaller sweet spot means that mishits are more punishing, and the racket demands more precise technique. The reviewer suggests that removing the cap plate (reducing weight by 8g) improves manageability, but the racket remains more demanding than the Hyper Pro.
Both rackets have a dry touch and require the player to generate their own power, but the Hyper Pro is more forgiving and better suited for players seeking comfort and ease in defensive play.
Vibora and tray shots: differences in effort and control
When executing vibora and tray shots, the reviewer observes that the Hyper Pro+ requires more physical effort, especially during extended rallies. Its higher weight and balance tire the arm more quickly, and the smaller sweet spot demands greater precision. Players must hit harder to achieve the same ball speed as with the Hyper Pro.
The Hyper Pro provides easier depth and speed with less effort, making it less demanding over long sessions. Its wider sweet spot is especially noticeable when striking higher on the face, offering more consistent performance even on imperfect contact.
However, the Hyper Pro+ excels in control during offensive play. For players who like to accelerate and hit with power, it delivers a more confident, controlled response, reducing the risk of overshooting. The reviewer recommends the Hyper Pro for those seeking a manageable, slightly forgiving racket for offensive play, while the Pro+ is better suited for advanced players who enjoy a firmer, more controlled feel at high speeds.
Volley performance: speed, comfort, and sweet spot response
During volleys, the main difference again centers on manageability. The Hyper Pro+ feels slower to move, especially during quick exchanges or directional changes. It requires longer, more forceful gestures to achieve the same ball speed, making it more physically demanding.
The Hyper Pro allows for deeper, faster volleys with less effort, providing a more comfortable experience. The difference in sweet spot is less pronounced here, but with the Pro+, off-center blocks or drop shots can result in the ball sticking to the racket, while the Hyper Pro remains more forgiving.
At higher speeds, the Pro+ offers superior control and confidence for aggressive volleying, while the Hyper Pro is more comfortable and easier to use for players who prefer not to exert maximum effort on every shot.
Smash and power shots: technical demands and power output
In the smash area, the reviewer expected more from the Hyper Pro+ in terms of raw power but found the difference with the Hyper Pro to be minimal. The Hyper Pro’s larger sweet spot and better rebound allow players to generate power more easily, even on less-than-perfect contact.
The Hyper Pro+ is more technical and demanding; only well-timed, well-struck smashes deliver superior results. For most players, the Hyper Pro will provide a better overall experience in power shots, especially for those who do not consistently hit the sweet spot. The Pro+ does shine in flat, strong smashes when struck perfectly, but is less forgiving overall.
Comparisons to other rackets and ideal player profiles
The reviewer draws comparisons with other well-known rackets to help players position these models:
- Hyper Pro 2.0: Similar in feel to the Hack Hybrid, Nox AT10 12K (especially last year’s harder version), and Nox 13.
- Hyper Pro+ 2.0: Comparable in hardness and dry feel to the Technical Viper and Oxdog Ultimate Pro Plus, but with slightly better handling.
For players seeking a manageable, slightly forgiving racket with good ball output and a dry touch, the Hyper Pro is the better choice. It suits those who want help in both defensive and attacking situations without sacrificing control. The Hyper Pro+ is recommended for advanced players who play firmly and quickly, and who value control and precision over forgiveness. It is more demanding but rewards technical skill and aggressive play.
Summary of key qualitative evaluations
- Hyper Pro 2.0: More comfortable, better handling, larger sweet spot, easier ball output, forgiving in defense and attack.
- Hyper Pro+ 2.0: Higher control at fast pace, firmer and drier feel, smaller sweet spot, more demanding, best for advanced players and aggressive play.
- Both: Dry touch, require player-generated power, excellent control, high build quality, and similar design features.
The price difference is minimal (€299 for the Hyper Pro, €309 for the Pro+), making the choice primarily about play style and skill level rather than budget.
