Royal Padel R-ACE M27: firm feel, standout control

This review explores the Royal Padel R-ACE M27’s precise, crisp feel and how it translates to performance on groundstrokes, volleys, overheads, and rebounds. Learn where it excels in control and post-glass acceleration, where it asks for more player-generated pace and forgiveness, and which playing styles will benefit most.

Video created by: @PadelChiquito

Feel in hand echoes Vertex Control, with a firmer touch

The channel describes the Royal Padel R-ACE M27 as having a feel that closely resembles the Vertex Control line. It sits on the firmer side, giving a pronounced connection to the ball. However, the reviewer expected more from it in baseline exchanges. On slower rallies, the ball tends to “sink” into the face, demanding a more deliberate swing to achieve depth.

That sensation shapes much of the racket’s identity: a controlled, stable response with a harder touch that rewards clean mechanics and centered contact.

Groundstrokes demand a longer swing to lift slow balls

From the back of the court, the creator notes that low-pace exchanges expose a lack of free help from the frame. The ball lingers in the face on slow feeds, so players need to extend the swing to push cross-court or down the line with authority. When the pace is already there, the racket behaves predictably; but when initiating the rally, it can feel laborious.

That performance translates into a modest baseline score: the channel rates groundstrokes at 6.4/10.

Net play and volleys: punchy response but a smaller sweet spot

Up at the net, the R-ACE M27 shows clearer upside. The reviewer finds it powerful on fast balls and confident when stepping into firm volleys. Quick blocks also carry well when timing is precise. The caveat is forgiveness: the sweet spot feels on the smaller side, which slightly penalizes off-center contact and reflex volleys.

Overall, the volley package lands at 7.3/10 in the channel’s scoring, buoyed by its punch but tempered by the tighter hitting zone.

Off-the-wall strokes benefit from the hard touch

Where the racket truly wakes up is after the glass. The firmer feel allows the player to load through the shot, and the ball then shoots out decisively. On rebounds, the creator highlights a fast, lively response with power that arrives more easily than it does from the backcourt on slow balls.

For these sequences, the reviewer gives it a strong 7.9/10.

Control stands out as the clear strength

Control is the headline. The channel repeatedly emphasizes how much you can “feel” the ball on the face, with a crisp, honest response that makes targeting lines and angles straightforward. When you catch the center, the exit is quick and predictable, allowing assertive placement without overhitting.

This category receives an emphatic 9/10, the racket’s best mark.

Finishing power is solid, even if not the category leader

On overheads and decisive balls, the R-ACE M27 proves capable of finishing points and clearly leans toward an attacking profile. That said, compared with the most explosive power frames from other brands, it doesn’t reach the very top tier for outright put-away force. The channel still scores finishing at a confident 8.5/10.

Maneuverability and forgiveness reveal limitations

The reviewer is less convinced about manageability. In quick exchanges and on the move, it isn’t the most effortless to steer, and combined with the smaller sweet spot, mishits are more costly than with more forgiving frames. This is particularly noticeable in defensive scrambles where a larger sweet spot can be a safety net.

Both manageability and sweet spot land at 6.2/10 each in the channel’s ratings.

Ball output and reactivity require player-generated pace

“Reactive” is not the word the reviewer would choose for this model. Free power on slow feeds is limited; you need to work the stroke and accelerate through contact to get depth. For players with a compact swing or those who rely on the racket to provide lift, this will be noticeable. The channel rates ball output at 6.8/10.

Comparisons to Bullpadel’s Vertex 04 and Vertex Control

The creator repeatedly aligns the R-ACE M27 with the feel of the Vertex Control and the Vertex 04 (2024). The parallels are clearest in the firmer touch and the need for a fuller swing to carry slow balls. If you’ve played those rackets and enjoyed the controlled, precise response but wished for a slightly punchier rebound after the glass, the R-ACE M27 sits in that neighborhood.

The reviewer’s scores for the Royal Padel R-ACE M27

  • Groundstrokes: 6.4/10
  • Volleys: 7.3/10
  • Off the wall: 7.9/10
  • Control: 9/10
  • Finishing power: 8.5/10
  • Manageability: 6.2/10
  • Sweet spot: 6.2/10
  • Ball output: 6.8/10

Who should consider the R-ACE M27, and who should pass

This is a control-first, firm-feeling padel racket that rewards players with clean technique and a longer swing. If you create your own pace, love to steer the ball precisely, and want extra bite after the glass, the Royal Padel R-ACE M27 will feel at home. Aggressive net players comfortable with a smaller sweet spot will also appreciate the punch on centered volleys and the reliable finishing ceiling.

Players seeking easy depth from compact strokes or maximum forgiveness may find more comfort in a livelier, larger-sweet-spot alternative. In that context, the R-ACE M27 aligns more with the disciplined, control-oriented end of the spectrum than with free-power, high-reactivity frames.

Article written by

Practica Padel Team

Practica Padel Team

Specialists in curating insights from padel coaches, professional players, and trusted reviewers. Our goal is to make expert knowledge easy to understand and accessible for every player.

READ MORE

Frequently asked questions

Who is the Royal Padel R-ACE M27 best suited for?

The R-ACE M27 suits disciplined players who value control and a firmer, connected feel. It rewards clean mechanics, a longer swing, and those who can generate their own pace. Aggressive net players comfortable with a smaller sweet spot will enjoy its punch. If you prefer easy depth and high forgiveness, it's not the ideal choice.

How does it perform from the baseline, and what swing style brings out the best?

From the back, it needs your help on slow balls. The ball sits in the face, so extend the swing, accelerate through contact, and use your legs to lift. With pace already on, it behaves predictably. Baseline performance is modest at 6.4/10, favoring players who start rallies with intent rather than waiting for the racket.

What can I expect at the net and on overheads with this racket?

At the net it's punchy when you meet the ball cleanly. Firm, directed volleys travel well and quick blocks carry if timing is precise, earning 7.3/10. Overheads finish points reliably with an 8.5/10 ceiling, though it's not a raw-power leader. Expect rewards for assertive positioning, and penalties on off-center or rushed contact.

How does it behave after the glass compared to backcourt play?

After the glass, the racket wakes up. The firm face lets you load the stroke and the ball shoots out decisively, delivering easier power than it does on slow backcourt balls. These sequences score 7.9/10. Focus on driving through the rebound and keeping the sweet spot aligned to maximize that fast, lively response.

How forgiving is the sweet spot, and how can I reduce mishits?

Forgiveness and maneuverability are the trade-offs. The sweet spot feels compact and mishits drop off more than with larger, softer faces. Quick exchanges can feel demanding, with both manageability and sweet spot rated 6.2/10. To mitigate, prioritize early preparation, loosen the grip slightly on impact, and aim for centered contact over stretched, last-second saves.

How does it compare with Bullpadel's Vertex 04 and Vertex Control?

It shares a lot with Bullpadel's Vertex Control and the 2024 Vertex 04: a firm touch, honest feedback, and the need for a fuller swing to move slow balls. If you liked their precision but wanted a livelier, punchier rebound after the glass, this model sits squarely in that neighborhood without being the most explosive.

Is it good value, or should I look for a more forgiving alternative?

Value depends on your priorities. If top-tier control, a connected feel, and reliable finishing matter most, it's an excellent pick, with category highs like 9/10 in control. If you rely on free ball output, easy depth, and a large sweet spot, you'll likely get better returns from livelier, more forgiving alternatives.