Who is the Adidas Adipower Multiweight CTRL 3.3 best suited for?

It’s a very versatile control-first frame that suits progressing players and consistency-focused advanced players. From the back court it guides depth with a clean touch, and at net it rewards precise placements. If you build points and value maneuverability with adjustable balance rather than maximum explosiveness, this model aligns well with your style.

How does it compare to the Adipower Multiweight 3.3 attack?

The attack version delivers more instant pop at impact and suits aggressive finishers who hit flatter through the ball. The CTRL prioritizes precision, forgiveness and easier handling, preserving options in defense and mid-court while still offering enough punch when well positioned. Choose attack for outright power; pick CTRL for control-first play with tunable balance.

What are the standout features of the CTRL 3.3?

Its Weight & Balance System lets you shift behavior with small screws, adding head weight for power or reducing it for quicker swings. Maneuverability is a highlight, keeping the racket fast in hand during rapid exchanges. A clean, direct feel, a forgiving sweet spot for a control frame, and steady ball output round out the package.

How should I set the Weight & Balance System for more power or more control?

For extra power, move the screws toward the head to raise swing weight and add a bit more thump without losing control. For maximum maneuverability and faster whip in defense and volleys, bias the weight toward the handle. Adjust incrementally and test, aiming to keep the racket’s stable, precise feel while tailoring response to your strokes.

How does it perform on volleys, bandejas and bajadas?

Volleys feel stable and direct, favoring accurate placements and easy steering under pressure, earning a 7.9/10. The bandeja is a strength at 8.0/10, letting you hold, guide and find controlled depth. The bajada is the weak spot at 6.8/10, with limited bite when trying to inject extra pace to finish points.

Is the sweet spot forgiving for developing players?

Yes. For a control-oriented model, the sweet spot is fairly generous and less punishing on off-center contact than many power frames. That forgiveness helps developing players maintain rally consistency and confidence. It’s not ultra-wide, but the balance of feel and leniency earns it a 7.2/10 for the sweet spot in testing.

Is it good value compared with other control-focused padel rackets?

It offers strong value if you prioritize precision and adaptability. You get high maneuverability, a clean feel, and an adjustable balance that can grow with your game, reducing the need to swap frames. If your priority is pure finishing power, the attack version or a dedicated power frame may justify the spend instead.

Adidas Adipower Multiweight CTRL 3.3 review control and feel

Baseline control and touch that reward steady rallying

The channel highlights the Adidas Adipower Multiweight CTRL 3.3 as particularly strong from the back of the court. The reviewer notes a very clean touch that makes it easy to feel the ball on the face and guide depth without over-hitting. There’s enough inherent punch to carry the ball deep, but the identity here is control-first. In short exchanges and long rallies alike, this is a back-court ally the creator repeatedly trusted.

That confidence shows in the score: the channel rates its baseline performance at 7.8/10, pointing to precise trajectories and reliable length rather than raw pace.

Volleys at net: responsive feel with measured punch

At the net, the racket “answers well,” with a direct response and a stable impact that favors accurate placements. The reviewer stresses that, compared to its attacking sibling, the CTRL carries less instant pop on contact. The Adipower Multiweight 3.3 (attack) has a touch more thump at impact, while the CTRL brings a calmer, more surgical feel for blocking, redirecting and closing angles.

As a result, the channel lands on a 7.9/10 for volleys: consistent, confidence-building, and easy to steer under pressure.

Wall descents and trays: control first, power with limits

The only moment where the creator wanted a bit more bite was the wall descent (bajada). Sensations were positive overall, but when trying to inject extra pace, the response didn’t jump as expected. That ceiling keeps it from being a true “finisher” in this specific situation, earning a 6.8/10 for bajadas.

In contrast, the bandeja (tray) is right in this racket’s wheelhouse. The reviewer felt the ball clearly on the face and could hold and guide the stroke with authority, finding controlled depth without overspinning. In terms of useful power on the tray, the channel assigns an 8.0/10, underlining the racket’s blend of feel and stability above the shoulder.

Power, ball output and sweet spot in perspective

Global power sits in a balanced middle ground: not a hammer, but enough to progress points when technique is sound. The channel characterizes the ball output as “good” rather than overly lively, which helps keep errors down. Still, in certain strokes—like the bajada—the reviewer missed a bit more sensation and support. Hence the 7.7/10 for ball output.

The sweet spot is described as fairly generous for a control-oriented model. Off-center contact is less punishing than on many power frames, which helps developing players maintain consistency. The channel assigns a 7.2/10 for the sweet spot, noting its forgiving nature without claiming it to be ultra-wide.

Maneuverability and the adjustable balance let you dial it in

One of the standout traits is maneuverability. The racket swings freely and stays quick in hand during rapid exchanges, a characteristic the creator values across defensive scrambles and at the net. Crucially, the Weight & Balance System lets players fine-tune behavior with small screws. Set for control, it becomes even easier to whip through contact; moved toward the head, you gain a touch more power while preserving a manageable swing.

Reflecting that flexibility, the channel rates maneuverability at a high 8.6/10, praising how the balance adjustments effectively shift the racket’s personality without breaking its core identity.

How it stacks up against the Adipower Multiweight 3.3 attack

The creator draws a clear comparison: the Adipower Multiweight 3.3 (attack) brings a bit more instantaneous force at impact, benefiting aggressive finishers and players who naturally hit flat through the ball. The CTRL 3.3, endorsed by Alex Ruiz, leans into command and sensation, preserving options in defense and mid-court while still offering enough punch when positioned well.

If your priority is outright power with fewer compromises, the attack version makes sense. If you want precision, forgiveness and easier handling across phases of play, the CTRL is the smarter pick.

Who the Alex Ruiz CTRL 3.3 will suit best

The channel calls this racket “very versatile” and recommends it to progressing players who don’t yet master every shot but want a frame that supports growth. It’s strong in control and solid in power, ideal for constructing points from the back and executing high-percentage volleys. Advanced players who favor consistency and feel over maximum explosiveness will also appreciate its composed impact and adjustable balance.

In the end, the reviewer’s overall impression is positive: a controllable, adaptable tool that stays helpful in many match scenarios, reflected in an overall versatility score of 7.7/10.

Adidas Adipower Multiweight CTRL 3.3: control-first, tunable balance