First impressions of the four Adidas padel rackets on court
The channel Mejora Tu Padel brought together a group of players to put four of the latest Adidas padel rackets through their paces: the Metalbone Hard (HRD), Metalbone 3.2, Adipower by Alex Ruiz, and Adipower Light by Marta Ortega. The test involved real match play, rotating rackets between players to gather a range of feedback on power, control, sweet spot, and handling. Each racket was evaluated in both defensive and attacking situations to provide a comprehensive comparison.
Players were encouraged to focus not only on performance but also on the sensations and sound of each racket, with special attention paid to how each model felt during different types of shots. The review aimed to uncover which Adidas model stands out for specific player profiles and playing styles.
Metalbone Hard (HRD): control and power with a firmer touch
The Metalbone Hard (HRD) was the first racket tested. Despite its name, players found it to be medium-hard rather than excessively stiff. The HRD surprised the testers with its balance between firmness and manageability, especially in defensive play where it did not penalize as much as expected. Overhead shots and smashes benefited from the racket’s harder core, providing a noticeable boost in power.
- Core: Medium-hard, not overly stiff
- Performance: Good in defense and attack
- Sweet spot: Larger than anticipated
Players agreed that the HRD is best suited for advanced players looking to improve their overheads and attacking shots. The standout feature was the control provided by the racket’s hardness, while no significant drawbacks were noted. The overall consensus was positive, with one player highlighting the pleasant sound and solid feel on impact.
Metalbone 3.2: a versatile option for a wide range of players
Next up was the Metalbone 3.2, the classic version of the Metalbone line. Testers with less experience in padel found this model particularly accessible, praising its handling and comfort from the back of the court. The racket was not perceived as heavy, and its performance in defensive situations was especially appreciated.
When comparing the HRD and the 3.2, players noted only subtle differences in hardness. The general feeling was that the Metalbone 3.2 offers a slightly softer touch, making it more forgiving for a broader range of skill levels. The sound was described as a bit drier, but the difference was not dramatic.
When asked which model they would choose if price were not a factor, most testers preferred the Metalbone 3.2 for its overall feel and versatility. This model emerged as the early favorite among the group, especially for those who value a blend of control and comfort.
Adipower by Alex Ruiz: the balanced all-rounder
The Adipower by Alex Ruiz stood out for its balance between power and control. Testers described it as the “middle ground” between the softer Adipower Light and the firmer Metalbone models. This racket was especially well-received by players with an intermediate skill level, offering enough power for attacking shots without sacrificing control or comfort in defensive play.
- Power: Noticeably strong, but not excessive
- Control: High, especially compared to Metalbone
- Recommended for: Intermediate players
One downside mentioned was the shorter handle compared to other models. While Adidas has reportedly lengthened the handle in the latest version, some players still found it a bit short, especially those accustomed to rackets with longer grips. Despite this, the Adipower by Alex Ruiz was a favorite for those seeking a well-rounded racket that adapts to various playing styles.
Adipower Light by Marta Ortega: agility and ease for lighter hitters
The final racket tested was the Adipower Light by Marta Ortega. This model impressed with its agility and lightweight feel, making it easy to maneuver during fast exchanges and volleys. However, the testers found it to be on the softer side, which affected control on deeper shots and lobs. Some players felt that the racket lacked balance and did not provide enough feedback or stability for more powerful strokes.
- Weight: Lighter than the other models
- Agility: Excellent for quick reactions and volleys
- Control: Less precise on deep shots
This racket is best suited for players who prefer a light, easy-to-handle racket and do not rely heavily on power. The standout feature was its maneuverability, while the main drawback was the lack of control over shot placement, especially when trying to generate depth or pace. The sound was also noted as particularly loud and distinctive, adding to the overall impression of a lively, responsive racket.
Player ratings and recommendations for each Adidas racket
Throughout the review, the testers provided clear feedback on the strengths and weaknesses of each racket. Their ratings and recommendations can be summarized as follows:
- Metalbone Hard (HRD): Best for advanced players seeking control and power; standout feature is its hardness and solid feel.
- Metalbone 3.2: Most versatile and preferred by the majority; suitable for a wide range of players, especially those who value comfort and handling.
- Adipower by Alex Ruiz: The most balanced option; ideal for intermediate players who want both power and control. Minor drawback is the shorter handle.
- Adipower Light by Marta Ortega: Best for players who prioritize agility and lightness; less suitable for those needing control or power on deep shots.
Overall, the Metalbone 3.2 and Adipower by Alex Ruiz emerged as the top choices for most testers, with the Metalbone 3.2 slightly edging out the others for its all-around performance and accessibility. The review provides valuable insights for players considering a new Adidas padel racket, highlighting the importance of matching racket characteristics to individual playing styles and preferences.
