Babolat Counter Viper vs Air Viper 2025: which is best?

Choosing the right padel racket can make a big difference in your game, especially when comparing two top models like the Babolat Counter Viper and Air Viper for 2025. This article breaks down their key features, performance differences, and which type of player each racket best suits. Read on to discover which model could help elevate your play on the court.

Video created by: @Elchiniconsejo

Key similarities between the Babolat Counter Viper and Air Viper 2025

The reviewer begins by highlighting the core similarities between the Babolat Counter Viper and Babolat Air Viper models for 2025. Both rackets share a 3D sandy roughness on the face, which provides excellent grip on the ball for spin shots. This texture is identical on both models, ensuring a familiar feel regardless of which racket is chosen.

Additionally, both rackets feature a long handle and the same cord system, making them comfortable for players who prefer a two-handed backhand or need extra leverage. The reviewer notes that these shared features make both rackets highly versatile and easy to adapt to for players familiar with Babolat’s design philosophy.

Differences in shape, balance, and weight

The most significant distinctions between the two rackets lie in their shape, balance, and weight. The Air Viper comes in a diamond shape, while the Counter Viper is round-shaped. This difference directly affects the play style and sweet spot location for each racket.

  • Air Viper: Diamond shape, slightly higher balance, lighter weight
  • Counter Viper: Round shape, lower balance, slightly heavier

The reviewer points out that the Air Viper has a marginally higher balance point, which can help generate more power in attacking shots. In contrast, the Counter Viper offers a broader sweet spot, making it more forgiving and easier to control, especially for defensive play.

Feel, touch, and ball output on court

Touch and feel are crucial for padel players, and the reviewer provides detailed feedback on this aspect. Both rackets are described as hard, but the Air Viper is “hard without being too dry,” while the Counter Viper is “hard and dry.” This subtle difference in tactile sensation can influence player preference, especially during longer matches.

When it comes to ball output, both rackets are characterized as controlled, meaning they don’t have excessive rebound and allow for precise placement. However, the reviewer favors the Air Viper for wall returns (“bajada de pared”) due to its slightly higher balance, which provides a bit more punch in these situations. Despite this, the Counter Viper is not far behind and remains highly capable in similar scenarios.

Performance in volleys, aerial play, and smashes

Both rackets perform exceptionally well at the net, offering quick maneuverability and solid response in volleys. The reviewer leans toward the Air Viper for net play, citing its lighter weight and speed as key advantages for fast exchanges.

In aerial shots such as bandejas and víboras, the Counter Viper stands out. The reviewer prefers the Counter Viper for these overhead strokes, appreciating its dry feel and stability. When it comes to smashes—whether aiming for a powerful “por tres” or bringing the ball back—the Counter Viper again gets the nod. The reviewer felt particularly comfortable with its performance in aggressive, attacking shots.

Sweet spot and forgiveness in match situations

One of the most decisive factors in the comparison is the sweet spot. The Counter Viper is praised for its larger and more forgiving sweet spot, making it easier to hit consistent shots even when contact isn’t perfect. This characteristic is especially valuable for players who prioritize control and consistency over raw power.

The Air Viper has improved its sweet spot compared to previous years, but the reviewer still finds the Counter Viper superior in this area. The difference becomes especially noticeable during defensive play and when under pressure at the back of the court.

Pros, cons, and target player recommendations

Both rackets share similar advantages and drawbacks. The main advantages are their versatility, maneuverability, and high-quality construction. Both feature the same cord system and handle length, making them comfortable for a wide range of players. The main drawback noted by the reviewer is the high price point for both models.

In terms of player suitability, the reviewer recommends both rackets primarily for intermediate to advanced players who can fully exploit their technical features. While beginners could adapt to either model, the reviewer suggests the Counter Viper as the better option for less experienced players due to its larger sweet spot and more forgiving nature. However, the Air Viper’s less dry feel might be slightly more comfortable for some newcomers.

Final verdict: which Babolat Viper 2025 model stands out?

After extensive testing and comparison, the reviewer ultimately chooses the Babolat Counter Viper 2025 as the more complete and satisfying option. The combination of a larger sweet spot, dry touch, and overall balance makes it the preferred choice, especially for players who value control and consistency alongside power.

  • Sweet spot: Counter Viper superior
  • Touch: Counter Viper preferred for its dry, crisp feel
  • Net play: Air Viper slightly faster and lighter
  • Overheads and smashes: Counter Viper excels
  • Forgiveness: Counter Viper more forgiving for off-center hits

While the Air Viper remains an excellent racket, particularly for those who prioritize speed and maneuverability at the net, the Counter Viper is considered the more well-rounded and reliable option for most players in 2025.

Article written by

Practica Padel Team

Practica Padel Team

Specialists in curating insights from padel coaches, professional players, and trusted reviewers. Our goal is to make expert knowledge easy to understand and accessible for every player.

READ MORE

Frequently asked questions

What are the main differences between the Babolat Counter Viper and Air Viper 2025 rackets?

The main differences are in shape, balance, and weight. The Air Viper has a diamond shape, higher balance, and is lighter, favoring power and speed. The Counter Viper is round-shaped, slightly heavier, with a lower balance and a larger, more forgiving sweet spot for better control.

Which type of player is best suited for each racket?

Both rackets are ideal for intermediate to advanced players. The Counter Viper is recommended for those who value control, consistency, and forgiveness, making it suitable for less experienced players as well. The Air Viper is better for players who prioritize speed, maneuverability, and attacking play at the net.

How do the rackets compare in terms of feel and touch on the court?

Both rackets have a hard feel, but the Air Viper is hard without being too dry, offering a slightly softer sensation. The Counter Viper feels harder and drier, providing crisp feedback. This difference can influence comfort and preference during long matches.

What are the key features that both rackets share?

Both rackets feature a 3D sandy roughness on the face for enhanced spin, a long handle for two-handed backhands, and the same cord system. These shared features make them versatile and comfortable for a wide range of playing styles.

Which racket offers better performance for volleys, overheads, and smashes?

The Air Viper is slightly better for fast volleys and net play due to its lighter weight and speed. The Counter Viper excels in overheads and smashes, offering stability, a dry feel, and a larger sweet spot for powerful and controlled attacking shots.

Is there a significant difference in sweet spot and forgiveness between the two models?

Yes, the Counter Viper has a noticeably larger and more forgiving sweet spot, making it easier to hit consistent shots even on off-center hits. This makes it especially suitable for players who prioritize control and need extra forgiveness during defensive play.

How do the rackets compare in terms of price and value?

Both rackets are positioned at a high price point, reflecting their advanced features and construction quality. While they offer excellent performance, players should consider their playing style and needs to ensure the investment matches their expectations.