Key technical specifications of the Nox AT10 Attack 12K and 18K 2025
The channel Probando Palas presents an in-depth comparison of the Nox AT10 Attack 12K and AT10 Attack 18K—two of the most offensive padel rackets in the Nox 2025 lineup. Both rackets share several core features, but key differences in their face materials and balance points set them apart. Here are the main specifications as tested by the reviewer:
- Shape: Diamond oversize
- Core: Nox MLD multi-density EVA
- Surface texture: Double rough (sand and 3D)
- Weight (tested units): 374g (with overgrip and protector)
- Balance point: 262 mm (12K), 258 mm (18K)
- Face material: 12K carbon (12K), 18K carbon (18K)
- Grip: Standard size with octagonal butt cap and Nox Custom Grip system
Both rackets feature the updated 2025 Nox technologies, including the new octagonal cap and an extractable cord system. The only notable construction difference is the type of carbon used on the faces, which directly affects the feel and playability.
Comparing the feel: 12K vs 18K carbon faces
The most significant distinction between the two rackets lies in the carbon fiber used on the face. The AT10 Attack 18K offers a medium feel—described as “medium and a bit more”—while the 12K version is noticeably firmer, sitting closer to a medium-hard feel but not reaching the rigidity of a true hard racket. The reviewer notes that the 12K’s feel is about two notches above medium, while the 18K is just one notch above.
This difference in rigidity translates into a slightly smaller sweet spot on the 12K, demanding more precision, especially at medium pace. However, the 12K rewards players with greater power and control when accelerating through shots, making it more progressive for those with a fast arm.
Performance from the back of the court
Despite their aggressive design, both rackets perform surprisingly well from the baseline. The AT10 Attack 18K stands out for its generous sweet spot and easy ball exit at medium pace, making it accessible even for players who don’t always hit the center. The reviewer highlights that the 18K’s balance (258 mm) and slightly softer feel help generate depth without excessive effort, while still allowing for quick maneuverability.
Switching to the 12K, the reviewer observes that it requires a longer swing and more precise timing to achieve the same depth at medium pace. The sweet spot is a bit smaller, but the racket offers more control and a firmer response when playing at higher speeds. Players who enjoy accelerating through the ball will appreciate the 12K’s extra rigidity, which translates into more direct power and stability.
Net play and volleying: control, power, and spin
At the net, both rackets deliver strong performance, but their personalities diverge. The 18K provides a good balance of power and forgiveness, with its larger sweet spot making it easier to block and redirect fast balls. The double rough surface on both rackets offers decent spin, though the reviewer notes it’s not the most aggressive texture on the market.
The 12K shines in offensive volleys and high-speed exchanges. Its higher balance (262 mm) and firmer face give it more inertia and control during aggressive volleys, especially in block situations. The reviewer finds that the 12K is more stable and less likely to lose control when volleying hard, making it the preferred choice for players who like to accelerate at the net.
For short touch volleys and drop shots, the 18K offers slightly more help, requiring less effort to move the ball. The 12K, on the other hand, demands a more deliberate technique but rewards precision and timing with excellent control.
Overhead shots, smashes, and aerial play
Both rackets excel in the air, but the reviewer singles out the 12K as the standout performer for overheads and smashes. Its stiffer face and higher balance help generate more power and a crisper response, especially when accelerating through bandejas, víboras, and flat smashes. The 12K is described as “the most progressive” of the AT10 Attack models for 2025, particularly for players with a powerful arm.
The 18K is more forgiving and easier to use at medium pace, making it suitable for players who don’t want to overexert themselves to achieve depth and power. It still delivers strong performance on overheads, but the reviewer notes that it can lose a bit of control at maximum speed compared to the 12K.
Spin generation is solid on both rackets, thanks to the double rough surface, and the reviewer is satisfied with the overall performance in winter conditions, where grip and control can be more challenging.
Protectors and accessories: classic vs Shockout Shockskin
The video also includes a brief comparison of two racket protectors: the standard plastic protector and the new Shockout Shockskin. The classic protector covers more of the frame but can sometimes peel off, especially on rough surfaces. The Shockskin, with its textured grooves, offers improved impact absorption and allows the racket to slide more smoothly against the glass, reducing the risk of frame damage. The reviewer appreciates the added protection and plans to explore more Shockout accessories in future content.
Summary of key qualitative evaluations
- AT10 Attack 18K: Larger sweet spot, easier ball exit at medium pace, forgiving and versatile, slightly softer feel, best for players seeking a balance of power and comfort.
- AT10 Attack 12K: Smaller sweet spot, firmer and more progressive feel, excels at high speed and aerial play, superior control in aggressive volleys, best for players with fast swings and a preference for stiffer rackets.
- Both rackets: Share diamond oversize shape, MLD core, double rough surface, and updated 2025 Nox technologies. Both are highly offensive but remain maneuverable and accessible for a range of players.
- Protectors: Shockout Shockskin offers better sliding and impact absorption compared to standard plastic protectors.
Final thoughts on choosing between the AT10 Attack 12K and 18K
The reviewer concludes that both the Nox AT10 Attack 12K and 18K are top-tier offensive rackets for 2025, each catering to a slightly different playing style. The 18K is ideal for those who value forgiveness and effortless depth, while the 12K is the go-to for players who want maximum control and power when accelerating. The differences in feel, sweet spot, and balance are subtle but noticeable, making it important for players to consider their swing speed and preferred style before choosing.
Ultimately, the channel leans slightly toward the 12K for its superior performance in fast-paced and aerial situations, but acknowledges that the 18K remains a highly versatile and comfortable option for a broad range of padel enthusiasts.
