Technical specifications and design differences between the at10 12k and siux st3 pro se
The reviewer from Probando Palas begins the comparison by highlighting the technical specs and design features of the Nox AT10 12K 2024 and the Siux ST3 Pro SE Stupa, two of the most versatile padel rackets of 2024. Both rackets share a format that sits between hybrid and round, offering a balance between control and power, but they differ in materials and subtle design elements.
- Nox AT10 12K 2024
- Weight: 358g (359g with overgrip)
- Balance: 262 mm
- Face material: 12K carbon fiber
- Core: MLD two-density rubber
- Surface: Sandy rough finish
- Siux ST3 Pro SE Stupa
- Weight: 360g (with overgrip)
- Balance: 259 mm
- Face material: 15K carbon fiber
- Core: EVA hard rubber
- Surface: Sandy rough finish
- Grip: Longer than the AT10 12K
While both rackets are similar in weight and general shape, the AT10 12K features small windows in the heart for improved maneuverability, and the ST3 Pro SE stands out with its longer grip, which the reviewer notes is particularly useful for aerial play and volleying situations.
Performance from the back of the court: comfort, control, and ball output
Testing both rackets from the baseline, the reviewer observes that the AT10 12K is easy to move and offers a medium-hard feel. The two-density MLD core provides a progressive response, requiring players to lengthen their swing slightly for optimal ball output. Despite its firmness, the ball leaves the racket with above-average speed, especially at medium and low intensities. The sweet spot is described as generous, making the AT10 12K one of the most versatile rackets of the year.
Switching to the ST3 Pro SE, the reviewer notes a slightly lower balance compared to the standard ST3 Pro, which improves maneuverability at the back of the court. The feel is also medium-hard but noticeably drier and less reactive than the AT10 12K. This dryness translates to more control, but players need to generate more movement at medium speeds to achieve similar ball output. The sweet spot is standard in size, perhaps just below that of the AT10 12K, and off-center hits are less forgiving. However, the ST3 Pro SE excels in control, especially when accelerating the ball at high speeds.
In summary, the AT10 12K edges out the ST3 Pro SE in terms of sweet spot size and ease of ball output, while the ST3 Pro SE offers superior control and a drier, more precise response for players who prefer to dictate play with their hands.
Net play and volleying: handling, spin, and offensive potential
At the net, both rackets deliver strong performances, but with distinct nuances. The AT10 12K is described as very complete for volleys, providing a good blend of ball output and control at medium pace. Its sandy rough surface offers decent spin without excessive drag, allowing for effective slice and topspin shots. The reviewer appreciates its progressive feel at high speeds, noting that off-center impacts do not cause significant loss of control or power.
The ST3 Pro SE impresses with its longer grip, which enhances leverage and power during volleys and aerial shots. The rough surface feels slightly more pronounced, generating more spin and bite on the ball. While players may need to extend their swing a bit more at medium pace, the racket rewards with excellent depth and control, especially in blocking and counterattacking situations. The ST3 Pro SE is described as “super controllable” and progressive, maintaining stability even when accelerating the arm for offensive volleys.
In direct comparison, the reviewer gives a slight edge to the ST3 Pro SE for its handling and spin potential at the net, particularly for players who value control and the ability to shape shots with precision.
Aerial game and finishing: power, balance, and shot versatility
When it comes to overheads, smashes, and finishing shots, both rackets show their multipurpose character. The AT10 12K offers a balanced feel for trays and vipers, delivering good ball output and spin. The reviewer is surprised by its progressive response at high speeds, allowing for quick acceleration without sacrificing control. For finishing shots like the “remate por tres” (smash out of the court), the AT10 12K performs well, though it is not a pure power racket and loses some punch in flat, all-out smashes.
The ST3 Pro SE, despite its slightly lower balance, stands out for its balance between control and power in aerial play. The longer grip aids in generating acceleration, and the racket feels well-balanced for both lifted and flat finishing shots. The reviewer is particularly impressed by its progressive power and the way it maintains control even during aggressive smashes. In fact, for flat, powerful finishes, the ST3 Pro SE is rated as slightly superior to the AT10 12K, thanks to its drier feel and the way the ball “sticks” to the face before release.
For players who prioritize finishing ability and aerial dominance, the ST3 Pro SE emerges as a strong contender, while the AT10 12K remains a well-rounded option for those who prefer a more forgiving sweet spot and easier acceleration.
Direct comparison and reviewer’s ratings across key game situations
To help readers understand the nuanced differences, the reviewer provides clear ratings for each racket in several game situations. These ratings reflect the channel’s direct experience and impressions during testing:
- Back of the court (comfort and ball output):
- AT10 12K: Above average, easier ball output, larger sweet spot
- ST3 Pro SE: Very good control, slightly less ball output, standard sweet spot
- Net play (volleys and offensive shots):
- AT10 12K: Progressive, reliable, good spin
- ST3 Pro SE: Excellent control, more spin, slightly more weight in volleys
- Aerial game (trays and vipers):
- AT10 12K: Very good, progressive, easy acceleration
- ST3 Pro SE: Equally strong, longer grip aids acceleration, slightly more progressive feel
- Finishing shots (smash and “remate por tres”):
- AT10 12K: Good, agile, but not a pure power racket
- ST3 Pro SE: Excellent, well-balanced, slightly superior in flat power shots
Overall, both rackets are positioned at the top of the reviewer’s list for multipurpose padel rackets in 2024, with the AT10 12K narrowly taking the lead for all-round versatility and the ST3 Pro SE excelling in control and finishing situations.
Final impressions and key differences between the siux st3 pro se and standard edition
In closing, the reviewer notes that the ST3 Pro SE shares the same format and materials as the standard ST3 Pro, with the main differences being the paint and a slightly lower balance. This adjustment in balance is seen as a positive, improving maneuverability without sacrificing performance at the net or in finishing shots. The SE version also feels a bit drier, which may appeal to players seeking a more controlled, less reactive response.
Both the Nox AT10 12K 2024 and the Siux ST3 Pro SE Stupa deliver outstanding versatility, making them top choices for players who want a racket that performs well in all areas of the game. The AT10 12K stands out for its forgiving sweet spot and easy ball output, while the ST3 Pro SE impresses with its control, spin, and finishing power. For those seeking a truly multipurpose padel racket in 2024, either model is a strong, well-reviewed option.
