Two Siux pro models with distinct DNA
The channel compares the Siux Electra Pro ST3 (signature of Franco Stupaczuk) with the Siux Diablo Revolution Pro 3 (linked to Sanyo Gutiérrez). The reviewer frames them as kindred on paper but aimed at different styles: the Electra is the more head-heavy, firmer, attack-minded option, while the Diablo leans into control and precision, with a slightly softer overall feel and easier handling.
That positioning showed up from the first rallies. The Electra felt “more reactive,” with a livelier ball exit and a stiffer impact. The Diablo held the ball a touch longer, making it easier to accelerate without overhitting from the back. The guest player noticed the same divide: the Electra “kicks” off the face sooner, whereas the Diablo lets him shape and place with fewer errors.
Build and adjustability: carbon, balance and grip
Both rackets use a 15K carbon face, but the internal layups and bridge geometry differ, which is where the distinct feel comes from. The Electra arrives with a higher factory balance; the Diablo is more neutral and nimbler. Siux’s use of ShockOut elements also lets players tweak balance slightly by moving the dampeners along the frame to shift weight toward the tip when desired.
- Face material: 15K carbon on both models
- Balance: Electra more head heavy; Diablo lower and quicker
- Vibration control: ShockOut system integrated in the handle
- Grip length: Electra has a slightly longer handle
The grip on both stood out for comfort. The guest highlighted the central rib feel and the clear reduction in vibration through the handle; neither racket transmitted shock, even in off-center contact. The reviewer would welcome a removable wrist cord in future Siux releases to allow easy swapping after sweaty sessions.
Baseline control and defensive lobs compared
From deep court positions, the Diablo drew praise. The reviewer found he could hit harder without sending balls long because the core “holds” impact a fraction longer. Lobs with the Diablo were described as “spectacular,” consistent, and easy to repeat under pressure. Its lower balance also helped with last-second adjustments in scrambles.
The Electra defended best when timing was clean. It launches the ball quicker, so touch has to be sharp, but the payoff is depth with less swing. If you like blocking pace and sending it back deep, the Electra’s rebound helps; if you need margin and longer dwell, the Diablo gives you that window to shape the shot.
Net play, speed and touch under pressure
At the net and in high-pace exchanges, the Electra’s stronger rebound and firmer face delivered a more aggressive volley and easier finishing power. In a “high-speed” drill, the reviewer expected the Diablo to win for soft touch but ended up preferring the Electra’s timing at low swing speeds for delicate drop shots—its response felt more predictable once he locked into the contact point.
The Diablo can still hit through the ball when you press, but it rewards technique-first play: careful preparation, compact swings, and placement. The Electra invites you to step on the gas and attack, provided you manage the extra kick off the face.
Reviewer and guest split on overall choice
The guest player, valuing margin and control, chose the Diablo Revolution Pro 3 as his overall pick. He found the Electra’s liveliness harder to rein in across a full match.
The reviewer went the other way, siding with the Electra Pro ST3. He highlighted its predictability once dialed in, the clear response at low-speed touch, and the ability to accelerate for winners. He did acknowledge that in pure defense the Diablo can feel easier for many players because of its handling and ball hold.
Who each Siux model suits, according to the channel
Siux Electra Pro ST3
- For players who like a firmer face and head-heavy power
- Best if you finish at the net and block pace into depth
- Predictable once timing is set; big payoff on volleys and overheads
Siux Diablo Revolution Pro 3
- For control-first players seeking maneuverability and touch
- Excellent for lobs, countering under pressure, and point construction
- Lets you swing through without fear of overshooting from the back
Key performance takeaways from the test
- Both use 15K carbon, but the Electra is clearly harder and livelier.
- Balance is the big separator: Electra = higher balance, Diablo = lower and faster in the hand.
- The Diablo delivered the best defensive lobs and margin from the baseline.
- The Electra excelled in net aggression and gave crisper timing on soft touch once adjusted.
- Both grips are very comfortable, with effective vibration damping; no shocks reported.
- Small but useful detail: the Electra’s longer grip can help two-handed backhands.
- Adjustability via ShockOut elements lets you shift balance slightly toward the tip.
The channel’s verdict is clear: there’s no universal “better” here—just two well-polarized Siux pro rackets that reward different intentions. Choose the Electra if you want sharper rebound and attacking bite; choose the Diablo if your game is built on control, patience, and precision.





